Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: tabtalker
Not much here...Nobody is charged with "leaking." The only relevance this might add is it would add credence to the possibility that Libby did learn the name from reporters. If he testimony included specific dates etc, this probably doesn't matter. Libby lied and nobody is charged with leaking.

I doubt fitz would go after Russert etc for claiming ignorance on her name/employer.

10 posted on 11/08/2005 9:04:48 PM PST by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Homer1

Fitz might have a tough time not dealing with what andrea mitchel had to say....and that relates directly to russert.


13 posted on 11/08/2005 9:14:45 PM PST by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Homer1

bttt


14 posted on 11/08/2005 9:49:19 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Homer1

"Libby lied and nobody is charged with leaking."

Is the trial over?


15 posted on 11/08/2005 10:29:15 PM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson