To: SJackson; Alouette; Salem; IAF ThunderPilot
2 posted on
09/28/2005 9:54:36 PM PDT by
anotherview
("Ignorance is the choice not to know" -Klaus Schulze)
To: anotherview
Hamas blows up their own truck in a crowd and blames Bush....
.
..
...
They might be ragin raghead idiots.... but they got hillary's playbook down to a science! haha
3 posted on
09/28/2005 11:13:38 PM PDT by
KeepArizonaFree
(Say no to McStain in 2008!)
To: Salem; SJackson; Alouette; IAF ThunderPilot; Bombardier; Esther Ruth; agrace; F15Eagle; Pyro7480; ..
"If the Palestinians continue to disrespect, defile, and even destroy Jewish and Christian holy sites, as they did at Joseph's Tomb, the Church of the Nativity, and most recently in Gaza, how can they be entrusted with some of the most important sites in Judaism, such as the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron? The sad fact is that they cannot. Israel must now consider extending the security fence to take in the Jewish sector of Hebron and the settlements in the Hebron hills, much as a finger of territory was walled off to protect Ariel in western Samaria. This, too, will cause much international condemnation, but what choice does Israel have? Certainly Israel cannot turn over part of Jerusalem. which is the holiest place in all of Judaism. For millennia Jews have prayed next year in Jerusalem. Despite the insistence by the Palestinians and most recently by the Jordanians that the Jewish people have no historical or religious claim to Jerusalem, this flies in the face of Jewish and Christian belief and three thousand years of history. As I have pointed out in the past, throughout the five centuries of Ottoman rule Muslims were a minority in Jerusalem while Jews and Christians were the solid majority. During most of that time the Jewish people alone were a majority in the city. So long as the Arabs as a whole and the Palestinians in particular deny Jewish and Christian history they cannot be entrusted to preserve or respect it. That, in turn, means that significant parts of the West Bank cannot be turned over to them. That, in turn, makes an independent state truly unlikely. One last question: since when is the torching of Jewish holy sites OK with the press? Why the uproar over American soldiers at Guantanamo Bay allegedly mishandling a Koran if destroying synagogues is OK? As Jack Englehard pointed out in the piece I quoted and linked last week it seems only Muslim holy sites are considered holy by the press anymore, This double standard, like all the double standards in Middle East reporting, disgusts me."
Major hit-the-nail-on-the-head ping!
5 posted on
09/29/2005 5:49:17 AM PDT by
Convert from ECUSA
(Not a nickel, not a dime, no more money for Hamastine!)
To: 1st-P-In-The-Pod; A Jovial Cad; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; adam_az; af_vet_rr; agrace; ahayes; ...
FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel/Russian Jewry ping list.
Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.
9 posted on
09/29/2005 9:20:03 AM PDT by
Alouette
(Militant Neocon Pundit)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson