But for you detectives out there ... here's a post with some further details of what she was involved in ... Just a short quote:
I have been sitting in front of this screen allowing my emotions to remember something that I have kept quiet for a long time. I feel like I am ready to speak. First, Cindy, this is for you, I understand on a miniscule level what it is you are trying to tackle. I attempted something of a smaller proportions in Omaha in 1988 when someone tried to take my child away from me. His name was Bill Baker and he was connected, unbeknowns to me, to the Franklin Credit Union, entire corruption on the City of Omaha, from the Police Chief Wadman, to the media Peter Citron to the corporate and on and on. But where it eventually landed was at the steps of the Republican party run by none other then Papa Bush.
There's other clues there if you scroll down which no doubt would be interesting for someone who knows how to investigate old newspaper articles.
BTW, anyone else want to join in just Google lynettebro440. Anyway, I must disinfect now ...
From those Google results, lynettebro's comments have made many sites, other than here and DU.
I have heard of these "CoverUp" allegations before but I never really followed up on them to see what it's all about.
Sure wish I had the time to do some serious research in this matter.
I've read some of the newspaper accounts provided on the web pages connected with this Franklin Credit Union Child Sex Ring. This one has a few news accounts. Evidently, a big deal is being made of the fact that one of the key players in this ring, Lawrence King, also headed said credit union and was part owner of an ADULT escort service based in DC. Supposedly this guy, King, contributed to a company that arranged speaking tours for Oliver North (I'm pretty sure they had other clients, but unless they're connected to Reagan/Bush they would be insignificant, naturally) and a girl who was part of this ring and under psychiatric care, believes she saw Bush at one of KIng's parties. Well, that's certainly enough evidence to decide Reagan/Bush are not just involved but probably kingpins.
King was convicted of embezzling $40 mil from the bank, but was never convicted for the child porn stuff, which (these being republicans) also involved satanic ritual murder. As with all heinous crimes involving wealthy republicans (dems apparently are angel-pure), the CIA helped to cover it up and stopped any investigation by the FBI...proving the FBI is actually under the control of the CIA...which, of course, makes one wonder why they were so uncoopertive with pre-9/11 intelligence...but rest assured...when it comes to wealthy politicians/dignitaries/businessmen involved in illicit sex the FBI is a wholey owned subsidiary of the CIA. Social services believed the children/teens according to this website, but I don't know whether or not there was a child-sex ring in Nebraska. The McMartin preschool case always reminds me how easy it is to create mass hysteria and put ideas previously NOT there into children's minds. It did get some press coverage (NYT, Village Voice), but except for a couple of foreign publications, the stories seem to have fizzled for lack of evidence...of course according to the websites the story was killed by the WH. Given that and how much the press all hate Reagan, you'd think they'd be hot to continue publishing and investigating during the Clinton admin. when conditions were definitely favorable to them.
Anway, this DC partner, Spence, who wasn't involved in the child-sex ring, got special tours of the WH late at night. At the time (and I don't see any proof that the tours were known/approved by the president or veep)...the article indicates this guy, Spence, had "cultivated" a uniformed Secret Service guy who helped him gain WH access. At one of the tours he brought a boy who he said was his 15 year old son, which turned out to be false.
However, this ADULT escort service/male prostitution ring in DC was used by some high ranking gov. officials, career-types with security clearance...from the sounds of it, DC insiders, etc. An investigation was being conducted by the SS and other law enforcement during the Reagan/Bush admin. The object (other than stopping an illegal activity) was to ferret out closeted gays working in government because the KGB would use that as a means of blackmail. Supposedly, the guys running these sex rings were republicans and probably contributed to election campaigns. If contributing/schmoozing with politicians is automatically going to make them a part of whatever crime said schmoozer is committing, then I'd think the democrats need to be very careful themeselves. Be that as it may, wouldn't one assume, if Reagan and Bush were hobnobbing with rich gays, they'd NOT have wanted AIDS to be spread around since (being greedy repubicans) they'd potentially lose a valuable source of contributions? Certainly all these conspiracy theories can't be right since they seem to conflict with one another.
Cindie