Zagor-te-nej,
I'm in no way trying to justify the actions of Bosnian Muslim terrorists, or their sponsors in the government of Bosnia. But to hear you draw a moral parallel between the Bosnians and Serbs during the wars of the 1990s is troubling.
The Serbs were the aggresors in that particular spat, and their troops were by far the more brutal. I understand (based on the links you posted) that you're upset at Clinton's decision to attack the Serb military - don't let your dislike for Bubba mislead you into support for the Serbs. They really were a ghastly gang of murderers. The fact that their Bosnian Muslim opponents also engaged in inhumane acts DOES NOT make the Serb actions any more legitimate!
I hope this London bombing wasn't the Bosnians, I really do. Because the West went to war for those people, putting a lot of our guys lives on the line. I hope this is not how they repay us.
- ThreeTracks
This is not about Clinton-ism. Long time ago I passed point of being upset with Clinton. You really need to wake up and smell the coffee. Alternative to reality and reality is this:
”It is not in fact possible for there to be any peace or coexistence between 'the Islamic Religion' and non-Islamic social and political institutions."
Alija Izetbegovic - “Islamic Declaration”, 1970
Is self lying that Serbs are aggressors on their own land and that “they (Serbs) really were a ghastly gang of murderers”! That approach will lead to more London style bombing in the future.
There is wealth of information out there.
Excluding some 30,000 Albanians living in the south-east, the Jews who emigrated in earlier times from Spain, a few Osmanli Turks, the merchants, officials. and Austrian troops, the rest of the population (about 98 per cent) belong to the southern Slavonic people, the Serbs.
The Catholic Encyclopedia
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02694a.htm