Thought I'd drop this into everyone's Saturday mix...
1 posted on
06/11/2005 9:08:51 AM PDT by
guitarist
To: guitarist; Dataman
They're not real scientists, they have the wrong kinds of PhD's, they got their PhD's from the wrong place, they teach at the wrong place, they quote stuff out of context, they misspelled "pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconeosis" so I can't trust anything they said, blah blah blah.
< /theophobe rant >
Dan
Biblical Christianity BLOG
2 posted on
06/11/2005 9:15:13 AM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: guitarist
3 posted on
06/11/2005 9:29:56 AM PDT by
trisham
("Live Free or Die," General John Stark, July 31, 1809)
To: guitarist
The truth is, if we took all of the DNA from every cell, and then compared the DNA in monkeys and humans, the 4-5% difference in DNA would represent approximately 200 million differences in a human body, compared to that of an ape! To help make this number understandable, consider the fact that 95% similiarity would mean 3.8 billion similiarities. Is your glass 95% full, or 5% empty?
To: guitarist
"Because DNA is a linear array of those four bases—A, G, C, and T ..."It spells Gattaca.
To: guitarist
7 posted on
06/11/2005 9:40:21 AM PDT by
Chiapet
(Cthulhu for President: Why vote for a lesser evil?)
To: guitarist
Please, just boil it down to the essential conclusions. Did we? Or, didn't we?
9 posted on
06/11/2005 9:59:42 AM PDT by
NetValue
(No enemy has inflicted as much damage on America as liberals.)
To: guitarist
Please don't confuse the evolutionists with all this complicated and uncomfortable talk about mitochondrial DNA, cells, chromosomes, genes and whether 98.5% is different from 95% - or even if it makes a difference - when comparing chimps to humans.
There's only one "scientific" textbook answer to this question of Origins...
10 posted on
06/11/2005 10:05:42 AM PDT by
Gritty
("The Democratic Party is the Frankenstein monster only the Clintons can jolt into life-Mark Steyn)
To: guitarist
I once while in delusional state of mind posting to a similar thread compared this aforementioned study with trying to make me believe a 2000 Chevy and Ford pickup truck were in fact 98.5 % similar.
Both trucks operate on the same principles, look the same, use the same fuel, about the same size, same speed, same materials to build.
But, just try and put a Chevy starter on a ford and give it a key turn.
Same goes with human and simian
I was excoriated and pointed to the obvious overwhelming evidence of this weeks version of Darwinian theory.
12 posted on
06/11/2005 11:31:22 AM PDT by
Popman
(In politics, ideas are more important than individuals.)
To: guitarist
No one can convince me that Alec Baldwin isn't related to the apes:
13 posted on
06/11/2005 11:44:10 AM PDT by
melt
(A slimy Michael Moore "film" sticks to you like grime.)
To: guitarist
If humans didn't evolve from monkeys, what was the physics of creation? I'd like a creationist version of the actual physical process that resulted in a human being. (Since that's what science means to address).
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past; ohioWfan; Tribune7; Tolkien; bondserv; GrandEagle; ...
ping
Revelation 4:11
See my profile for info
20 posted on
06/12/2005 6:27:26 PM PDT by
wallcrawlr
(http://www.bionicear.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson