The point I'd like to make is that all the libs are screaming about the 1600+ deaths over two or more years in Iraq. So, in WWII, in ONE DAY, there wre 3393 deaths, ONE DAY, mind you, and in the entire Iraq endeavor, there have been approx 1600 deaths. Libs want wars where no one dies. They are too chicken to knock WWII though (the greatest generation, hard to knock that). Besides WWII was under Roosevelt, a Dem, not as now, where Bush and his war are fair game. The hypocrisy astounds me.
It shouldn't. The libs don't care about anyone dying in Iraq, that's not what it's about. If the Marines went through and cut the throat of every baby in Iraq, the libs would howl but they wouldn't care.
They howl and they scream not because they have some disdain for violence, but because Bush represents to them a stall in creeping socialism. The agenda is, and was in the 1960s during Vietnam, to advance socialism and communism, and that's the only reason they make noise. It's not hypocrisy, it's advancing the agenda.
For those who think this is about war in Iraq, they're wrong. Look at the groups opposed to the war, they all one way or another get tied back to communist organizations.
The war in Iraq is just a means for them to challenge Bush.
Not really.
Hitler, you see, is the ONLY great bogeyman ever on the face of the earth.
Liberals hate him (if only because he and Stalin got on the outs).
He is the only man ever in history with whom they would never negotiate till the cows come home. He's the only 1 ever worth killing.
So because of that, they say WWII is a "good war", and maybe the only 1. Except for ACW, wherein they obsess on the myth of "freeing slaves".