I know. I just skimmed the article at first and said "WTF??" That's why I looked at his previous posts to see what's he's about and he didn't seem to be a disruptor, so I came back and more carefully read the rest of what he posted and finally "got it", though I agree it's not historically accurate or particularly well-written.
I'm trying to be MORE careful. I tried to initiate a ZOT on an "innocent" a couple of days ago. ...felt bad about it. :-)