3393 Americans are DEAD

Sam Pender-author ^ | 6/5/05 | Sam Pender

[HiJinx]

3....2....1....

[Guillermo]

This thread is outta here, but...Bush should consider that the "our friends," the Saudis, are the leading cause of terrorism on earth.

[Guillermo]

And, Iraq doesn't sit on "40% of the worlds oil."

[tet68]

In before the zot

[hiredhand]

...and your opinion is?

[Keith in Iowa]

I think one does not even need to be adept at lip reading for that one...

:)

[SittinYonder]

W T F ?

[saquin]

READ THE WHOLE THING!

I almost called for a zot before I saw he's quoting an ironic piece that is talking about 3393 Americans who died on D-Day in WWII.

Read this line: "3393 Americans are dead! They died on June 6th 1944 Invading France to impose democracy on a people who should have risen up for it themselves, to fight a dictator who never attacked the US but considered himself at war with the US, and who had no cooperational ties to Japan-the nation that DID attack the US."

It's an ironic parody of what the screeching left would have said during WWII.

CALL OFF THE ZOT!

[You Dirty Rats]

Stupid article. Hitler declared war on the United States on December 11, 1941.

[Wormwood]

Yeah, but now I think I may have posted it in error. My apologies to Blackrain4xmas

[Larry Lucido]

3393 Americans are dead! They died on June 6th 1944 Invading France

I got the point of the article, but it took some digging.

[SittinYonder]

It's not historically accurate.

[hiredhand]

I'm still waiting for his opinion. I'm always suspicious when somebody just tosses this sort of thing out there without a word about what they think about it.

[Knitting A Conundrum]

[umbagi]

You waited over a year before telling us how you really feel?

I'm hurt...

[MinorityRepublican]

C'mon say something before we all think you're a troll. Yes, that means you have to actually respond to one of us, instead of a hit and run.

[saquin]

I'm always suspicious when somebody just tosses this sort of thing out there without a word about what they think about it.

I know. I just skimmed the article at first and said "WTF??" That's why I looked at his previous posts to see what's he's about and he didn't seem to be a disruptor, so I came back and more carefully read the rest of what he posted and finally "got it", though I agree it's not historically accurate or particularly well-written.