To: ReeWalker
Well now I have to go back and look at them. I didn't enlarge my screen because the amounts are all wrong so I figured why bother with Gruntled's new phoney.
273 posted on
06/01/2005 4:36:31 PM PDT by
CAluvdubya
(Let's exercise the "Byrd" option!)
To: CAluvdubya
I think this once again proves there was never any surgery set for May 10th since we were told time and again that the bloodsuckers at JH wanted all the money up front. It appears one of the checks wasn't written until May 19th, the day before the supposed receipt from JH was written and well after the May 10th "operation" date.
278 posted on
06/01/2005 4:41:42 PM PDT by
beandog
(The only time I was wrong was the time I thought I was wrong)
To: ReeWalker
the date on both of those receipts are May 11th. But on May 20th, the financial statement said nothing had been paid on the account. The boxes "paid on account" are clearly marked on the receipt. Whose account was it paid on, anyway?
279 posted on
06/01/2005 4:41:54 PM PDT by
CAluvdubya
(Let's exercise the "Byrd" option!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson