PBS is just a variant of religious broadcasting. Once PBS started broadcasting Deepak Chopra, Dr. Wayne Dyer, Joseph Campbell, John Bradshaw, Sam Keen, and the like, it was abundantly clear that PBS is just a Trinity Broadcasting Network for secular humanists and New Age mystics. Heck, even Carl Sagan used PBS to evangelize the Drake Equation as evidence of extraterrestrial intelligent life.
It’s no coincidence that PBS touts its gurus during fund drives; like Bob Tilton or Jim Bakker, PBS solicits cash from the hopeless while promising fulfillment. And, like the religious hucksters, they enjoy the good life for their labors; for example, Bill Moyers has garnered over $20 million from PBS … and who knows how much Deepak is worth?
It's not the "educational channel" any more, if it really ever was.
LOL Flashback! Remember this...
The Computer Lawyer
SECTION: CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS; Tort; Vol. 11, No. 8; Pg. 32
Apple Computer Inc. did not defame the prominent scientist Carl Sagan by calling him a "Butt-Head Astronomer," a Central District of California court ruled, because the term did not imply any assertion of an objective fact such as professional incompetence. Carl Sagan v. Apple Computer, Inc., CV94-2180 LGB (C.D. Cal. 1994).
Apple Computer's project managers routinely assign code-names to products in development. In 1993, one of Apple's project managers assigned the code name "Carl Sagan" to a personal computer it was developing. After learning that his name was being used, Sagan had his attorneys write a letter to Apple demanding it cease. In response, the project manager changed the computer's code-name to "Butt-Head Astronomer." Sagan filed suit in federal court for libel, infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy, unfair competition, and violation of the Lanham Act and California law on the use of likenesses.
Apple argued that the term was an opinion, protected under the First Amendment. Judge Lourdes G. Baird agreed. She noted that a statement of opinion can only form the basis of a libel action if a reasonable fact-finder can conclude that the statements imply an assertion of fact. Judge Lourdes [sic] held that "one does not seriously attack the expertise of a scientist using the undefined phrase 'butt-head,'" and that a reader aware of the context would understand the project manager was retaliating in a humorous and satirical way.
Judge Baird also ruled that Sagan could not recover for infliction of emotional distress, noting Sagan is a public figure and that a public figure could only recover for infliction of emotional distress by showing that the publication contains a false statement of fact made with actual malice.
"PBS is just a Trinity Broadcasting Network for secular humanists and New Age mystics ... like Deepak Chopra, Dr. Wayne Dyer, Joseph Campbell, John Bradshaw, Sam Keen...."
Bump for reference.