No sir, it is not. Your position and your opinion that proceeds from it are clearly uninformed.
As it pertains to the meaning of vegitative state, and all that the term clinically implies, you have demonstrated no amount of personal clinical diagnostic accomplishment on your own part that qualifies you to make the judgment that you have carelessly made in this area. Futhermore, it is not up to any of us to do your research for you.
Do your research, make your case, and stop posting the equivalent of "I'm not a doctor in real life, I just play one on FR" kinda stuff.
I don't have to. The court ruled she is in that state - based on expert clinical testimony. Why should your opinion or mine or anyone's outside of the experts in that court room matter?