Skip to comments.
NEOCON MAG PROMOTES ANTI-MUSLIM HATE LITERATURE
AAMERICAN MUSLIM NEWS BRIEFS
| 20050315
| CAIR
Posted on 03/17/2005 6:07:24 PM PST by Nicholas Conradin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: Nicholas Conradin
I've read 15 different definitions for the phrase, "neocon," and I still don't get the Jewish connection.
I thought that it was neo=new, and con=conservative.
The new conservative politics of promoting our democracy around the world, and the unabashed use of force against tyrants and dictators to improve and ensure our world position in the new millennium, no matter what the other Nations thought.
Where the heck did "Jew" come into that?
41
posted on
03/18/2005 10:46:28 AM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Nicholas Conradin
Note to the Islamist org, CAIR:
Stop the Taqqiah.
1. The Protocols are lies. The quotes on Mohhamed come out of the Koran and Hadith.
2. National Review is Fusionist Conservative not neoconservative.
42
posted on
03/18/2005 11:24:20 AM PST
by
rmlew
(Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
To: Endeavor
"Hah! NR is a NEOCON mag??? Get serious."
Before the Election, our own US neo-Nazis were slamming it as just that. Along with some in identity groups they'd gathered, they said that NR was the product of a Jewish conspiracy.
CAIR's choice of words is very telling for all others who use the word, "neocon" or "neoconservative" against our American interests. I am an American and have an American identity (not European).
43
posted on
03/18/2005 2:57:37 PM PST
by
familyop
(Essayons!)
To: bill1952
Oh, that's in wordy diatribes from all over the left. We already know about the antisemitic, anti-American garbage being issued from the likes of antiwar.com. Here's one tiny example of their neo-Nazi, anti-American European connection, if you can stand to read it.
"Eurolegal Services"
"US Neoconservatives"
http://www.eurolegal.org/useur/usneocon.htm
(antisemitic Euro-crap behind the link)
Tom Metzger's bunch was way left. David Duke renamed his organization to "EURO."
"Neo-conservative" is name calling against all who support Israel (the multitudes of Christians who are in favor of Israel surviving) and who disagree with neo-Nazism.
44
posted on
03/18/2005 3:11:11 PM PST
by
familyop
(Essayons!)
To: bill1952
Oops--correction of my own writing:
Where I wrote, "the multitudes," it was meant to say, "including the multitudes." The "neo-con" name calling is primarily against Jews but also used against all who support their right to live and have their mandated homeland.
45
posted on
03/18/2005 3:16:05 PM PST
by
familyop
(Essayons!)
To: bill1952
I've read 15 different definitions for the phrase, "neocon," and I still don't get the Jewish connection. The designation "neoconservative" was originally given to (or IIRC adopted by) a group of people who had become disenchanted with Democrat Party liberalism, primarily in foreign policy. Specifically, in policy toward Israel.
Most of the original neoconservatives were Jewish, and "neocon" was soon used by the opposition as a antisemitic epithet.
46
posted on
03/21/2005 6:24:11 AM PST
by
Nicholas Conradin
(If you are not disquieted by "One nation under God," try "One nation under Allah.")
To: Nicholas Conradin
You don't have to read the definition to see that in CAIR mind neocons and Jews are the same. It is easy to see from the note at the end of their statement. They are more or less demanding "quid pro quo".
47
posted on
03/21/2005 10:37:27 AM PST
by
chukcha
To: Nicholas Conradin
"Hooper said anti-Muslim rhetoric often leads to discrimination and even violence. "
And they put up the website where Muslims could self-report instances of bias to prove it.
48
posted on
03/21/2005 3:21:27 PM PST
by
dervish
To: familyop
49
posted on
03/23/2005 10:22:10 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Sunday, March 13, 2005.)
50
posted on
03/23/2005 10:41:04 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Sunday, March 13, 2005.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson