Replies

I can't listen to him anymore because he is constantly (and I mean constantly) giving left-wing kooks a media platform.

To use a couple of examples: In the two weeks prior to the inauguration he provided airtime to some lofting kook who was trying to create an economic boycott as a means of protest to the Bush presidency. My question is why? It only provided advertisement for this loser's cause. He followed this up last week by interviewing a women who was trying to do essentially the same thing.

A few months back when the 9-11 Commission came to New York for hearings, the meeting was disrupted by the gang of four wives of victims who had become the darlings of ABC, NBC and CBS because of their repetitive Bush bashing. So what does Hannity do? He invites them on his show so they could continue to spew their vitriol. He did this in the face of other victim's families who were trying to get public attention because they basically agreed with what Bush had done since 9-11. Of course this group (which I believed numbered in excess of 100) had been totally ignored by the MSM. Why didn't Hannity have them on which would have been a perfect counterpoint to the gang of four?

Sean Hannity is nothing more than a "useful idiot" for the left. He constantly provides a media platform for the left when they have so many others available to them.

Well, he may be giving the kooks a platform just so his listeners can see just how kooky they are. Savage played sound bites from the protestors the day after the inaugural, and it was really something else. I mean, these people are absolutely consumed by hatred for the President, and their reasons are just nutty. All they can do is repeat what they've heard their moronic leaders say...Bush lied, Bush is after oil, Bush is trying to ruin the country...blah blah blah. It was sickening and funny at the same time. Savage was making sure everyone knew what kind of people we are up against. I think Sean does that sometimes, too.