Whats that suppose to mean?
You must be advocating social welfare right?
After all it is the governments resposibility to provide us with everything right?
Sorry but before government welfare people had kids and took care of them and we dont need a nanny state, but we do need a state that protects innocent life.
I'm not going to rehash the eternal abortion debate here.
What I'm saying is that if you claim to love babies so much and feel that every fetus should be brought to term regardless of whether or not their parents want them or can afford to care for them, then you'd better have a plan in place for taking care of those babies if and when their parents either neglect to do so or are unable to do so.
And yes, that plan is inevitably going to involve gobs of money being sucked up by a social welfare system.
That doesn't sound appealing? Then stop trying to force a bunch of women who are unwilling or unable to care for their children to have them.
It's common sense. Somebody is going to end up having to take care of these kids, and that somebody is going to be you and me, in the form of our tax dollars.
Read his "about" page.