To: Fatalis; HenryLeeII; eno_
Yah there are a few of us willing to resist the impulse to look like a tinfoiler but we seem to be outnumbered on this thread. The call could have come late Friday or early Saturday. The timeline alone isn't enough to close this case but some folks got excited by the premise of this thread (which was erroneous) and now are playing at cyber-diagnostics to force the few facts we do know to fit the conclusion they want. No, you're the one "forcing facts". The fact is that the article says that Kerry said he received a call from Reeve on Saturday. So far, all we have to go on are what the articles say.
243 posted on
10/12/2004 12:11:48 PM PDT by
Lijahsbubbe
( Jammin' in my jammies)
To: Lijahsbubbe
No, you're the one "forcing facts". The fact is that the article says that Kerry said he received a call from Reeve on Saturday. So far, all we have to go on are what the articles say.The articles say that Kerry heard a message on his cell phone Saturday not that Kerry "received a call from Reeve on Saturday". Do you see the difference?
249 posted on
10/12/2004 12:45:26 PM PDT by
Fatalis
(The Libertarian Party is to politics as Esperanto is to linguistics.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson