[kbeam]

That last quote about resisting evil is fantastic. If you're godless, as the left is, is there really an "evil", or is it just someone else's alternative viewpoint? Why does Carter love Castro, why did Clinton invite Arafat to the White House? Carter may teach Sunday school, so I'm told, but he is quite evil.

I'll say this about good and evil, each one of us is one or the other, there is no in-between. If you sit on your butt and watch others tortured/killed, you're pretty stinkin rotten. That's why I never liked FDR, even though he's always being given kudos (I guess Pat Buchanan therefore fits into this mold as well).

The only conduits for good and evil are man, not some tidal wave, or meteor, etc (although is could be possible that the big fella may look down on us one day and say, "I've had enough of this crap, and send a meteor, and no Bruce Willis is going to save that day). So when the Bin Laden's of this world go on the offensive, you sissies on the left, put away your stupid tissues and candles and those worthless UN resolutions and reach for your glock.

Enough said

[Retief]

You are quite correct. The left doesn't believe in good or evil. Both have been banished by the concepts of "moral relativism" or "moral equivocation".

These concepts are also used to eliminate any right that the US has to defend itself or act preemptively. It goes something like, "well the US supported the Shah, therefore the US is just as bad as Iran and cannot stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons." Israel having nuclear weapons is also seen as a justification by the left for allowing Iran to acquire the same kinds of weapons.

Taken to its logical extreme, perhaps the left would have preferred that the US have done nothing to stop the Nazis in WWII, since the US at one time had slavery and "was just as bad as the Nazis."