Skip to comments.
Can you help NavyChief at the SBV forum?
SBV forum ^
| Love bloggers
Posted on 10/06/2004 8:43:30 AM PDT by Lovebloggers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: griswold3
I personally doubt that there is something that "huge" out there. I don't think he would have survived the vetting process that the Dem's put candidates through.
41
posted on
10/06/2004 9:26:06 AM PDT
by
brothers4thID
(I have knocked on door of this man's soul- and found someone home.)
To: brothers4thID
I don't think he would have survived the vetting process that the Dem's put candidates through.
BWAH HAHAHAHA!! What vetting process did John Forges Kerry survive except that he wasn't named Howard Dean?
42
posted on
10/06/2004 9:28:39 AM PDT
by
sdkhaki
To: Lovebloggers
Hey Chief, this is the place to post your story, Free Republic is full of people who know how to get a story out, and former military who will understand the lingo.
43
posted on
10/06/2004 9:31:10 AM PDT
by
Jarhead1957
(Turn off Fox .)
To: Seeking the truth
To: Lovebloggers
Have your Navy Chief friend post the information right here on Free Republic, and it will be everywhere it needs to be within 12 hours.
Look at how fast the Rather memos were exposed as frauds.
If your Navy Chief friend does not want to post here, then either the information is bogus, unverifiable, or else there is a monetary motive behind his desire to release them 'to the highest bidder.'
45
posted on
10/06/2004 9:36:43 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
To: Lovebloggers
Has he contacted Ben Ginsberg who acts as legal advice for the Swift Vets? I would suggest this as a first step.
Then he should contact Hannity. Hannity is the only one with any guts to stick up for the SwiftVets.
To: brothers4thID
I understand what you're saying...however if Bill Clinton and John Kerry are examples of the Dems' vetting process, I would say they have just a FEW cracks that some things can slip thru.
47
posted on
10/06/2004 9:39:07 AM PDT
by
justshe
(Become a monthly donor.....eliminate Freepathons!)
To: Yo-Yo
I'll respect your opinion and right to free speech. But your last comment deserves some of my own opinion and free speech:
Pull your head out of your A$$! If you don't know me, then don't dare speak about my motives.
- Chief
To: Lovebloggers
Rest assure, if NavyChief says it is explosive then that is exactly what it is. Could this be one of those "October Suprises"?
49
posted on
10/06/2004 9:40:43 AM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
To: WinMod70
I linked to it from the top of this thread.
To: brothers4thID
I think Kerry and friends just assumed that by not signing the 180, and the cooperation of the MSM, they could keep everything under wraps. remember they thought the Swiftvets would just "go away" because no one in MSM would give them the time of day. FR and the blogs have changed everything.
51
posted on
10/06/2004 9:43:34 AM PDT
by
tazannie
To: brothers4thID
I don't think he would have survived the vetting process that the Dem's put candidates through.Don't kid yourself look who they nominated. A uberliberal do-nothing gigolo peacenik from Mass, who could ask for more?
52
posted on
10/06/2004 9:44:53 AM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
To: The Real NavyChief
Hooray - the Chief is here!!
53
posted on
10/06/2004 9:45:21 AM PDT
by
tazannie
To: The Real NavyChief
Navy Chief - please don't take offense of some of the posts here as they are unfamiliar with the SBV forum. I appreciate all that you have done!
To: Lovebloggers
Well that peanut farmer Carter was President 1/20/1977 to 1/20/1981..and President Nixon 1/20/1969 to 8/9/74 and Ford was President in between Carter and Nixon, 74-77.....so that maybe be a clue..
To: tazannie
I wonder if he needs info FROM Judicial Watch. they might not be very effective in winning anything, but they do have some stuff on Kerry, maybe some documents or something that Navy Chief could use for verification, etc. I think you've nailed it. Navy Chief isn't looking for legal help (he could easily get that from the Swift Vets - O'Neil, Ginsberg, et al.), he's looking for information that JW may have in their possession.
56
posted on
10/06/2004 9:46:20 AM PDT
by
So Cal Rocket
(Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
57
posted on
10/06/2004 9:46:39 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(The President's job is not to pass a global test, but to protect the American people.)
To: So Cal Rocket
Navy Chief is now registered on Free Republic and is posting. Let's help him any way we can!!
To: The Real NavyChief
Hey Chief, welcome to FR.
sKerry said "bring it on", thanks for complying, LOL.
59
posted on
10/06/2004 9:49:04 AM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
To: Lovebloggers
60
posted on
10/06/2004 9:49:51 AM PDT
by
boxerblues
(www.ohbluestarmothers.org)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson