Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FORGING GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS IN TEXAS IS A FELONY
http://mostlydeadarmadillos.blogspot.com/ ^ | Wednesday September 22, 2004 | Stephen Johnson

Posted on 09/23/2004 6:34:50 AM PDT by CHAROM

Forging government documents is a Third Degree Felony. It looks as if Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott wants to make a case, he has the goods to do it.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 09/23/2004 6:34:50 AM PDT by CHAROM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHAROM

It'd be tough to cnvince most judges or juries that what was supposed to be one individual's "memos to file" were government documents.

Ronnie Earle might give it a try, though, if it involved the GOP...


2 posted on 09/23/2004 6:37:00 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHAROM

Do you think Burkett and his lawyer will turn states' evidence in exchange for immunity?


3 posted on 09/23/2004 6:37:01 AM PDT by airborne (God answers all prayers. Sometimes the answer is ,"No".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHAROM

Don't hold your breath. If there's one thing I've learned since 1992, (from watching the Clinton escapades) it's that points of law that appear to be crystal clear are often ignored or spun out of reality.

Laws are for little people and Republicans.


4 posted on 09/23/2004 6:38:44 AM PDT by DJ Frisat (Hand me the duct tape before my head explodes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHAROM

First, one must prove these are actually "Government Documents."


5 posted on 09/23/2004 6:39:08 AM PDT by ez2muz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I heard on the radio this morning that in the new york times there was an article about how it is against the law for someone to forge a document and feed it to the media in order to sway an election.


6 posted on 09/23/2004 6:40:23 AM PDT by republicanbob1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CHAROM

Isn't it also a felony for those million or so in Texas who using social security numbers fraudulently as well?


7 posted on 09/23/2004 6:40:31 AM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez2muz
Right. I can't see purported private CYA memos being considered government documents, even if typed on-base. And they weren't on TANG stationery, as I understand.

Now, forging the signature of a federal officer (Killian), that might work.

8 posted on 09/23/2004 6:41:02 AM PDT by MoralSense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

Exactly. If this involved the GOP, Earle would be all over it.


9 posted on 09/23/2004 6:43:18 AM PDT by toomanygrasshoppers ("Hold on to your hats.....it's going to be a bumpy night")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: MoralSense; ez2muz; Redbob; CHAROM
The statute does not only apply to government documents. (Which make sense, because wills, checks, notes, contracts, etc. aren't government documents.)

Quoting from staute:

(1) "Forge" means: (A) to alter, make, complete, execute, or authenticate any writing so that it purports:

(i) to be the act of another who did not authorize that act;

(ii) to have been executed at a time or place or in a numbered sequence other than was in fact the case; or

(iii) to be a copy of an original when no such original existed;

(B) to issue, transfer, register the transfer of, pass, publish, or otherwise utter a writing that is forged within the meaning of Paragraph (A); or

(C) to possess a writing that is forged within the meaning of Paragraph (A) with intent to utter it in a manner specified in Paragraph (B).

[end quote]

'Utter' doesn't mean 'speak words' here, it has to do with checks, etc., I think.
11 posted on 09/23/2004 6:49:06 AM PDT by Mike Fieschko ("Daddy, are there bad men on your planes?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MoralSense

Or... maybe Safire has a good angle here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1224594/posts


12 posted on 09/23/2004 6:49:46 AM PDT by ez2muz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: airborne

"Do you think Burkett and his lawyer will turn states' evidence in exchange for immunity?"


This is really what will 'move this case forward' to quasi quote Lockhart. Having Burkett turn on CBS and ALSO having Rather turn on Mapes. He's now claiming that he was 'hands off', basically throwing her right under the bus. If she gets canned (and I hope to hell she does) she'll be very likely to turn on him too.

This thing is far from over.


13 posted on 09/23/2004 6:50:55 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Right, and thanks for the statute. "Utter" means "cause to be produced," I believe, or "circulate with meaning."


14 posted on 09/23/2004 6:55:11 AM PDT by MoralSense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
You are probably ahead in this game of using federal law by going at them with the Mail Fraud statutes.

After all, these documents were "letters" even though they were transported outside the mail.

The Private Express statues might even apply since there were various intermediaries used who failed to pay the requisite postage, or other fee for express services.

People have been busted for less ~ not too many years ago a teacher's union in the Chicago area had to pay a serious deficiency for this sort of thing. Then there was the store-front mosque ~ USPS spent thousands of dollars collecting a $25 deficiency.

Former Maryland Governor Marvin Mandel was sent to prison over a couple of letters.

The list of vicious Mail Fraud statute violators is long and famous ~ best possible law to nail someone when the other laws don't quite seem to fit!

15 posted on 09/23/2004 6:56:13 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CHAROM

Is passing a counterfeit bill that you did not create illegal, if you knew it was counterfeit and you tried to pass it anyway?


16 posted on 09/23/2004 6:57:34 AM PDT by lyingisbetter ("Let's wait Kerry" or Let's go Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHAROM

In Texas the Attorney General has no responsibility for criminal prosecutions, except in cases where he either assists local prosecutors (at their request) or is appointed to represent the State when the local prosecutor is disqualified.


17 posted on 09/23/2004 6:59:12 AM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHAROM

Won't they have to prove that the forgery took place in Texas???


18 posted on 09/23/2004 7:00:17 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
I agree with you that Ronnie Earle is, and has always been, nothing but a third rate Rat hack.

Any memo written by personnel that includes the name and address of the unit and the name and rank of the officer writing it that is composed entirely of information about company business is considered official correspondence, IE, a government document. This includes memos to file or self.

19 posted on 09/23/2004 7:07:59 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (Kerry Campaign: An army of pompous phrases moving across the landscape in search of an idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MoralSense

According to CBS "Power Puff Girls" stationary was available in 1971 and was often used by the Texas Air National Guard.


20 posted on 09/23/2004 7:10:05 AM PDT by Pan_Yan (Unemployed people should forfeit their right to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson