Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tribemike

Don't agree. The public has come to expect debates. Reagan was in a stronger position than Bush is now, and he nevertheless debated twice.

Jimmuh Carter initially refused to debate Reagan, then dragged his feet until public opinion finally forced him to capitulate... there was one debate in the final week of the campaign... and Jimmuh got his clock cleaned by Reagan... and the rest is history.

So I'd say, agree to debates, just make sure they're not too close to the election so any positive effects have time to wear off, in the unlikely even K does well.


13 posted on 09/19/2004 1:14:51 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ambrose
Jimmuh Carter initially refused to debate Reagan, then dragged his feet until public opinion finally forced him to capitulate... there was one debate in the final week of the campaign... and Jimmuh got his clock cleaned by Reagan... and the rest is history.

"There you go again!"

21 posted on 09/19/2004 1:19:23 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (What did Dan Rather know, and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson