To: reformedliberal
Given these gaffes based on lack of knowledge of how things worked, I am not prone to place this on Burkett (sp), the disgruntled Guardsman w/a history of mental/emotional instability. Seems to me, he would know those details cold. He's there as a conduit in making the link, IMO I'm not sure Burkett is the source either, although the 86 year old secretary sure wants you to believe he's the source. Her interview in the Dallas Morning News mentions how the memos were using Army terminology (eg, billets), which wouldn't have been used by the Air Force. It just turns out that Burkett is Army National Guard. Is it a coincidence that she points the finger to Burkett, or is that what the DNC told her to do when they went over the talking points with her( "unfit for command", "selected, not elected")?
My theory is that someone used the Burkett story about memos in the trash to create the memos and then gave them to Burkett to pass on to the DNC. Knowing that Burkett had suffered 2 nervous breakdowns, the forger knew he would fall for the memos and knew that the DNC would use them if they came from Burkett.
To: rocklobster11; Howlin; Common Tator
I keep thinking this was set up by Lehane or Mulholland. Lots of cut outs being used. Absolutely no compunction about who took the fall, as long as it wasn't them. Manipulation on a grand scale. And all of it so outrageous, that, if it worked, the perp/idea man would be the strategist of the millennium for the Donks.
Lehane's DUI strategy almost worked. Mulholland went to the wall for Davis/Bustamente in the California recall. They both are in need of redemption if they are to keep their positions in the DNC Mafia/RICO. They both specialize in sewage and aim to kill.
Isn't Lehane an attorney? Is Mulholland? Couldn't they lose their license to practice?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson