Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/13/2004 8:26:50 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: BOBWADE; Mrs Zip

ping


3 posted on 09/13/2004 8:29:45 PM PDT by zip ((Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 42% of americans))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Actually it's quite easy to bait Haters, and others with pathological hatred (Dan Rather re Republicans and Bush)


4 posted on 09/13/2004 8:30:24 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

If this was a sting operation, it only makes it all the more amusing.


5 posted on 09/13/2004 8:31:19 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Thank you Rush Limbaugh-godfather of the New Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Dear Dan,

You are either a forger or a sucker. Which is it? Why protect a source that had to have known that he/she was putting your good name in jeapordy?

Personally, I think you're just a partisan sucker.


7 posted on 09/13/2004 8:32:22 PM PDT by umgud (speaking strictly as an infidel,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
"The forgeries are amateurish, crude and blatant."

Only two individuals I know worthy of that description: Carville & Begala. Everybody knows that the Clinton's want Kerry out so Hillary can run in four years. Hell, Kerry even knows it. His whole campaign has been run by Clinton cronies.

9 posted on 09/13/2004 8:33:21 PM PDT by mass55th (It's the superscript, stupid!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

The patient has flatlined, and Rather's attempt at resuscitation has failed.

Somebody call the time...


11 posted on 09/13/2004 8:34:16 PM PDT by hsrazorback1 (G'night, John Boy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
I looked at your posting history. Do you ever comment on anything, or do you just methodically post articles.

It's impolite to disappear after you post an article.
12 posted on 09/13/2004 8:34:34 PM PDT by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the Rats in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
These people underestimate the curiosity and passion for the truth of conservative bloggers. We are now the gatekeepers and the old media is finding out we are not as credulous as the past generation.
13 posted on 09/13/2004 8:34:41 PM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

I confess it was all me. And while I'm confessing let me also say I'm really Karl Rove.


14 posted on 09/13/2004 8:34:52 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (If "W" stands for wrong, what does the "F" in John F Kerry stand for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

What's the superscript Kenneth?


15 posted on 09/13/2004 8:35:33 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (If "W" stands for wrong, what does the "F" in John F Kerry stand for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

I don't think this was some sort of Machiavellian plot. The dems routinely make outrageous statements, e.g., "One million African Americans were disenfranchised in 2000," "If Bush is elected it will be the end of Social Security," "Old people will die," "Children will starve," etc. The forgery case at least had an element of evidence, minimal and easily refutable as it was. I think it's just another page from the old dem playbook--throw as much crap at the wall as you can, and hope something will stick. Too bad for them that the Forgery Wall was made of rubber.


16 posted on 09/13/2004 8:36:02 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
Well, the conspiracy monkey has pooped it's last peanut. With this double, triple back-flipped, Democrat-on-Democrat-against-Democrat, with a cherry on top bunch of nonsense, there really is nowhere else to go.

The Clintons must be the smartest people in the World...and their party, the dumbest.

17 posted on 09/13/2004 8:36:40 PM PDT by Deb (The Democrat Party is a Criminal Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
No need for a complex setup theory. Rather and his colleagues are blinded by their hatred of Bush. They are looking for anything at this point to still up uncertainty and scandal. They probably knew some things didn't smell right but either assumed the viewers are idiots or have no concept of the power of the Internet and new media. They would have completely gotten away with this 10 or more years ago.
19 posted on 09/13/2004 8:36:46 PM PDT by Sunnyvale CA Eng.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
Lets look at the possibilities....

If the Democrats would fall for a republican operative giving them these documents as if they were genuine, THEN THEY ARE STUPID AS STUPID IS!!!

If a democrat operative created the forgeries and passed them off as originals to Dan Rather.. THEN THEY ARE STUPIS AS STUPID IS!!!

.

The only conclusion that any rational person can come up with is that the DEMOCRATS are STUPID and Dan Rather is their WATER BOY

21 posted on 09/13/2004 8:38:08 PM PDT by MJY1288 (John Kerry Says He Can Do a Better Job of Implementing President Bush's Policies :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
Don't believe it. They went to great pains to get the dates and names right. They also make sure that everyone involved was already dead except Bush. They were so happy with their research that they did not even think of typesetting errors. The one giveaway is Col. Stuart was already retired at the time. Why did they get that wrong? Because a Boston article got it wrong.
22 posted on 09/13/2004 8:38:21 PM PDT by Nateman (Rather : I did not have factual relations with the DNC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Dan DuBois. Has a nice ring to it. Maybe he can use it to get a job doing consumer reports in Little Rock.


23 posted on 09/13/2004 8:40:53 PM PDT by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
I think the author gives the DNC too much credit -- as a group, they have such contempt for the military that I doubt that any among them realizes there is such a thing as military protocol in correspondence.

As for the computer-generated letters, why bother with a decent forgery when you can rely on the likes of Dan Rather, USA Today, the AP and assorted other propaganda machines masquerading as news organizations to carry the banner?

And finally, if the fraud doesn't work, just blame it all on Republicans.

29 posted on 09/13/2004 8:46:47 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

The problem with analysis like this is that it presupposes all the things that we all know now. It also presupposes that the writer new everything we know now. You presuppose this was a life long forger when in all actuality it was probably some over confident schmuck that thought no one could notice.

Here is a hint for anyone out there committing a crime... Now listen carefully.

Most people committing a crime be it robbery, murder or simple forgery don't know what they DONT KNOW. And dectectives that investigate this stuff every day, what you might not think of they have seen in different variations 2 dozen times last week.
So what you might think is brilliant fails in comparison to the 48 other things you could not possibly have known because you are not an expert in that field.

THAT is why Free Republic is brilliant. You all the sudden have 800 to 1500 eyes looking at your brillance and it only takes one person to go.....hey... wait a minute....

Just know this has happened on FR before and it will over and over again. We WILL be a very HUGE political threat to the opposition because in the old days ( Mr. Rather) you could get away with this type of thing, and everytime you do you get more confident in your abilities...

NOT ANY MORE ....


33 posted on 09/13/2004 8:47:40 PM PDT by Walkingfeather (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Hillary after 6 degrees of Separation! kerry is surrounded by Clintonistas.....I call him George Custer Kerry!!


40 posted on 09/13/2004 8:54:14 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

The idea that this is a hit on Kerry makes for a much more complicated conspiracy than the obvious truth, that it was a desperate attempt at a hit on Bush.

Why do people always want to assume that criminals like these are clever or crafty? They rarely are. Especially when they are a Democrat operative.

Whoever did it thought "hey, Killian is dead, so no one will be able to definatively discredit it... afterall, most people know that Bush was AWOL anyways and this will at least get them talking about it. People will finally see the TRUTH!! It will be the end of Bush!"

Maybe they didn't think it verbatim, but pretty close I imagine. That's how the left honestly thinks. Sad but true.

We've established at the very least that this person was a leftist, so we know they aren't going to think logically or rationally. So why would you think that they could hatch a brilliant plot to frame Kerry?

Whoever plotted such a masterful plan would have had to predict every move made by all of the players thus far. They would have to predict that the Kerry campaign and the DNC would be so quick to embrace it, and they would have to predict that the forgery would be exposed. They would have to predict that CBS would stonewall on revealing their sources.

That's a lot of calculations that had to be dead on accurate. Wouldn't it be more likely that the perpetrators just made one simple miscalculation instead?

No one ever claimed Democrats were all that smart.


46 posted on 09/13/2004 9:02:22 PM PDT by counterpunch (The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson