Get Real barely covers it.
Would you deny a person cancer treatments if they "couldn't clear themselves of the cancer by themselves without medical intervention"?
of course not, that's why this thread his CRAP !
Does the Church shun all medical technology in relation to infertility? By no means. Technology, when used morally, is in fact a solution to many problems. In cases where medical technology can repair or heal damaged reproductive organs it is of great value. In cases where fertility drugs can augment the woman's natural capacity to produce eggs (when used conscientiously and with regard to possible consequences of multiple pregnancies) the Church blesses the technological solution. But technology that usurps the natural biological functions for no legitimate health reason is immoral.
"Would you deny a person cancer treatments if they "couldn't clear themselves of the cancer by themselves without medical intervention"?"
I don't know of any cancer treatment that involves sacrificing the lives of an innocent human beings.
Do you?
So you believe it is right to kidnap someone and steal their organs, if you need a transplant?
Infertility is not a life-threatening illness. No one has the right to kill 140 OTHER PEOPLE in order to remedy infertility. I am reporting you for abuse, because you advocate killing babies, which is a form of BIGOTRY.
More precisely, I WOULD deny anyone treatment for cancer if the treatment required killing 140 OTHER PEOPLE.