Is it because you can't understand what I'm saying or you simply reject the notion that God's will was for us to freely choose Good over Evil instead of being forced like automotons always to do what He wanted?
I don't see any "rationalization" inherent in accepting objective reality's consistent natural laws of physics. How would scientific achievement be possible were we not able to confirm by repetition and empirical analysis our predictions about how the world -- right down to human procreation -- works?
These laws allow for magnificent feats in the realm of medical advances to repair, lengthen and alleviate suffering in human lives. Unfortunately, they're also the subject of manipulation by those who would destroy human live en masse in order to build a better Human in their own image of Perfection.
Where's the "rationalization" here?
The rationalization is to propose that because some cute children survive this evil process, and we can't condemn cute babies, then the survivors must be God's way of making some good come of it. Once you proposed unequivically that the process is against the will of God, then I wonder exactly why he would bless it with life and a soul. I am not a fan of IVF myself either for a host of reasons.... I just don't propose to know exactly how God feels about it, only note that he lets it happen.
Thanks for your responses though!