Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: logos




Since I've been with you all since the very beginning I must say for the record: I've not seen anyone banned capriciously, for spite, as an act of vengeance, or for any reason I didn't agree was valid.

It's some of the non-bannings that really raise the questions.

If they aren't valid, then neither are some of the bannings.


743 posted on 10/10/2003 10:26:12 PM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 734 | View Replies ]


To: Sabertooth
It's some of the non-bannings that really raise the questions. If they aren't valid, then neither are some of the bannings.

El Bingo....

761 posted on 10/10/2003 10:35:47 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies ]

To: Sabertooth
It's some of the non-bannings that really raise the questions.

Such as?

787 posted on 10/10/2003 10:49:05 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson