Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Sentis
I just hate people who run off at the mouth with nonsequitors or whose scientific education they got out of a cracker jack box.

Yup, that's why I completely disbelieve evolution. Look at the garbage written by nobodys in TalkOrigins, look at the pseudo-scientific nonsense written by Darwin, Dawkins, Gould. Nothing there but could be's maybe's, perhapses and possiblys. Evolution is not science and never has been. It has always been the anti-science. The example of junk DNA shows very well to what extent evo 'science' goes into the deep end to justify itself in complete opposition to everything PROVEN by real scientists with real experiments.

348 posted on 10/08/2003 8:16:16 PM PDT by gore3000 ("To say dogs, mice, and humans are all products of slime plus time is a mystery religion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]


To: All
I do not see much explanation as to how evolution takes place according to modern science. In fact such an explanation is utterly imppossible because evolution has been totally discredited by modern science. Therefore:

I hereby challenge - all evolutionists - to show that I am wrong in saying that evolution has been refuted by scientific advances in the field of biology.

1. The disproof of Darwin's racist claim that the brachyocephalic index showed what races were superior and which were inferior. While some may dismiss this as a minutae, it is a strong refutation of evolution because it shows that there has been no 'evolution' in the human species and according to evolutionists evolution is always going on.
2. Mendelian genetics showed that the transfer of new traits was very difficult if not impossible. Indeed because a new trait or mutation is not in the gene pool of other individuals, it has an almost impossible chance of survival.
2a. Mendelian genetics also showed the concept of alleles - duplicate genes in every organism which performed the same function but a bit differently. This allows the adaptation of a species to the environment without the need to wait for a chance mutation to occur. It shows that transformation of organisms is not necessary for survival.
3. DNA - a Nobel Prize winning discovery - showed the utter complexity of the cells in every organism. It laid to rest forever the concept that just a little mutation could transform an organism or a species.
4. Genome Project - showed the utter interrelatedness of every single gene, cell, part of the body. It has shown that it is impossible for any new trait to evolve by chance occurrence (or at random, or without design or whatever you wish to call how evolutionary changes to the genome are supposed to occur according to evolution). For any change, for any transformation to occur, there would need to be the coevolution of the new trait together with a complete support system to make it work. This of course is totally ludicrous, especially in view of 2 and 3 above.

So as you can see, all the big achievements of science have been towards disproving evolution. All the big achievements of science in the last 150 years have been towards proving Intelligent Design.

350 posted on 10/08/2003 8:22:24 PM PDT by gore3000 ("To say dogs, mice, and humans are all products of slime plus time is a mystery religion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies ]

To: gore3000
Pseudo-science do you even know what that word means? Grow a set and answer a few questions for us. If your so smart big boy how old is the universe and the Earth? So us your mighty brain.
360 posted on 10/09/2003 2:25:08 AM PDT by Sentis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson