I too want to see a citeYou're joking, right?What's a cite?
Let me say as politely as possible that this subject has nothing to do with "brights" unless you, the bright, are asking me, the dim, to do your research for you.Oooh, no need to get snippy about it. Just because your claim that the planes were discovered under "thousands of layers" of ice is melting before everyone's eyes...
I remember seeing the layers myself since it was either TLC or the Discovery channel that had cameras in the shafts. They showed the rescuing process and the layers. They mentioned the problem that 4.5 feet of ice per year presents. If you need a web photo, feel free to use the search engines available with which, I understand, you are familiar.
This is good - a cite, of sorts even! So here's what I get when I do a search for "Lost Squadron" on the Discovery Channel/TLC website. But fear not, I am relentless. Here's a page from the Lost Squadron website, which features layers and layers of t-shirts. Unfortunately this is a different Lost Squadron. But we're getting close, I just know it! This page shows the Glacier Girl in the snow, but I think this is after pulling it (in pieces) up thru the hole. At any rate, I can't make out any ice layers in the picture.
Well, that's all the cites I could find which could possibly support your claim of the planes buried under "thousands of layers" of ice. Now, if you could honor us with your own research, maybe we could verify this claim of yours.
Or were you merely, ummm, caught up in the spirit of the moment, and wish to retract that claim?
Being a fundamentalist Young-Earth-Creationist means never having to admit you lied to the heathen! Clueless recruits ensnared by deliberately misleading them must count for some brownie points in the afterlife or something.
It's out there if you care to spend the time to look. But this is all peripheral to the previously stated problem.
Remember the moon dust problem? Scientists with their evolutionary presuppositions feared the dust would be so deep it could swallow up any craft that attempted to land. After a trip they found that their presuppositions and calculations needed to be "adjusted" since they found nearly no dust. It's a similar set of presuppositions that suffered when the lost squadron was found. Now all we need to do is wait for the "adjustment."
I expect you to dismiss any anomaly with the wave of a hand as usual. Regardless, unless "science" gives more than a theoretical guess as to why the planes were 250 feet deep in 50 years it will be a problem discussed in future classrooms while the facade continues to crumble.