Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
"the earlier method was subject to considerable "noise" from cosmic rays"


Did you read this article cause they talk about how this new method reduces this noise, hence the 90,000 year outer limit now. You are a very hostile person.
123 posted on 09/25/2003 4:24:52 PM PDT by MontanaBeth (USA-its enemies are my enemies-foreign or domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: MontanaBeth
The switch in techniques does not address the issues that I raise at all. I said nothing about cosmic rays, although that probably remains a minor problem as well.

I merely noted an incongruity in your post. No real geologist would mention carbon dating as a source for the age of the earth. I do not speculate on how this happened.
129 posted on 09/25/2003 4:29:17 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson