[Maelstrom]

Which falls back to a more serious argument yet to be defended.

The logic you've used here would imply your support for Clinton, if only he were a Republican. You need to explain why this is not the case.

Why is supporting Arnold any different from supporting the policies championed by Olympia Snowe, J. Jeffords, Chaffee, and that lot of Republicans who more consistently vote in favor of Democrat policies?

What do you hope to gain other than an (R) behind the name of the man enacting the latest liberal policies?

[SONbrad]

Where the heck do you get that? Your logic is so ill-defined it is pathetic.

Nothing I said even insinuates that.

I guess if you can't win, you try to dazzle them with b*llsh*t!

[SONbrad]

So now since I do not support YOUR candidate.....then I MUST be a Clinton voter.

How horribly pathetic. You continue to make your positions weaker and weaker. Drawing such wide conclusions...with, by the way, no LOGIC whatsoever.

You simply stated that a real conservative on the ballot would win. He is NOT. Where does that leave YOUR logic? MMMMMMMM?