Clearly, one can know Arnold from his fruit. It's rotten, just as Clinton (who waived bibles around) had rotten fruit. Anyone who supports killing babies has huge moral problems. Period. And any Christian who votes for a baby killer is making a moral compromise (want me to say it again in caps?). I judge actions not people. I will judge your actions if you vote for people who have policies and beliefs contrary to biblical teachings. There is NO DEFENSE for it. I also see that you are taking a reprobate's side (68grunt) against the brethren. Bad move. "The spiritual man judgeth all things but is judged by no man." 1Cor 2
However, I might make an exception IF the position that the candidate would hold would make decisions about abortion.
For instance, the fact that Christy Todd Whitman was pro-choice didn't bother me much because in the EPA, she would never make any decisions about abortion. (I had problems with her for other reasons).
I want my Senators, my Congressmen, and my President to be pro-life.......and my Governor.
But will Arnold, as Governor, be making any decisions about abortion? (Other than the partial birth abortion ban position which he supports)?
Or is it possible that voting for McClintock/Bustamante might indirectly put MORE innocent babies' lives at risk? Will voting for a losing McClintock actually result in the deaths of more babies?
These are legitimate questions that solid, strongly pro-life conservatives ask..... Being pro-life is required of a Christian, to be sure. But is voting for one candidate over the other, with the same goal in mind required? I'm not so sure.....
btw, I was referring to your assumptions about me, and those like me, based on limited information......not Arnold.