Excuse me.....but don't you find it a tad ironic that you are accusing me of 'ad hominem attacks' after posting THIS?? LOL!
I was on this thread to discuss the California gubernatorial election, and subsequently the Perot effect of the 92 election which relates to it.
George W. Bush's policies were off topic, and I wouldn't have responded to them, regardless of your pleading that I do so.
I posted to you in response to your attacks on other Christians about this gubernatorial election.....relevant to the overall discussion.
You repeatedly try to draw me off topic (so I finally went back and read your post), and then accuse me of not addressing the 'issues,' attack me with meaningless insults, show incredible displays of emotion, and then call yourself an ADULT?
I'm sorry ex......but you amuse me.
One last point about Arnold, though. Unless you know he has not asked for, and been forgiven by God for his 'reprobate' status as a young man, you cannot use it against him in this election.....Christian, or no.
If you want to use his pro-abortion position, that is another matter. But past sins which have been repented of, do NOT disqualify a candidate from office.
He has made his position clear: Pro-abortion, pro-gay adoption, pro gun control, and calles McClintock supports "right wing" zealots. I'd say these positions make him a reprobate by definition! Ahh-nold is a socialist and since he still favors killing babies or destroying the family, I can't find any repentance in that! Can you?
As for your other comments,
Not meant as an attack, just an observation. Your very name/handle indicate that you are a Bush sycophant, but anyone who would call himself a "Wfan" (on FR no less) should expect people to assume he is a diehard Bush loyalist and defender. A pox upon me for jumping to such a conclusion from your handle. "Sychophant" is a little harsh since it suggest a servile function, so would it be more accurate to say you are a "diehard Bush loyalist?" It's okay to be a Bush loyalist, it's your choice. I simply don't believe that Bush or the Republicans represent my interests. This is a "Free Republic" isn't it? Or should I just fall in lock-step with Bush when he is wrong on so many issues (see the 13 I listed and that is just a start!)?