[ohioWfan]

I didn't even SEE your post #339 until now!

I was here to discuss the relative merits of voting for McLintock or Schwartzenegger for the good of California, when someone made the claim that Arnold's debauchery was the same, or worse than xlintons, and I argued that point.

I was also debating with someone else that it was conservative purists voting for Perot that resulted in the election of the most debauched, dangerous man who's ever been President.

I just happened to notice in passing that you were nasty, accusatory and demeaning to those with whom you disagreed, so I made a comment about it.

Now I know why smart people from outside of the state of California avoid these threads........

Now settle down, and enjoy those fish.......

[exmarine]

Still nothing of substance....

[exmarine]

I didn't even SEE your post #339 until now!

Even though I mentioned it AT LEAST 3 times in our exchange! People like you can only argue via ad hominem as you have nothing of substance to offer. Let the record show that you attacked me first and I merely defended myself. The fact is that I would bury you on the issues and that is why I believe you didn't bother responding to #339. Let the record show that too. Now go back to your cozy little Ohio life and leave politics to adults.

[Maelstrom]

You also have an additional weakness in your argument.

You've labelled conservatives who don't vote for liberals as "conservative purists" if those liberals are Republicans.

It's a weak lie and now clearly exposed.