To: ETERNAL WARMING
I'd vote for Davis before I'd see Ahhhnold in office.You raise an interesting point. Would actual Conservatives be better served by voting "No/McClintock"?? Seems to me as an outside observer that a weakened Davis would provide more opportunity to elect a Republican in 2006, maybe even one with coattails, than a nominal Republican taking over the current mess and getting blasted in 2006 for not fixing it.
I have my flame-proof BVDs on, so all the Ahhhnuld folks can just have at it...
To: UncleJeff
Seems to me as an outside observer that a weakened Davis would provide more opportunity to elect a Republican in 2006, maybe even one with coattails, than a nominal Republican taking over the current mess and getting blasted in 2006 for not fixing it.
Exactly. And coupled with the mess that years of Democratic agenda have done, I don't think a Republican can straighten it out...especially a RINO like Arnold. The failure would do irreparable harm to Republican interests for the foreseeable future. It would give the Democrats a platform for '06 and shift the blame from themselves.
To: UncleJeff
Sounds great Jeff, but will we survive 3 more years of "tax and spend". How high will the deficit be? How many more illegals will be here getting free college educations, WIC, AFDC, medi-cal, etc?
170 posted on
09/15/2003 9:11:47 AM PDT by
gc4nra
( this tag line protected by Kimber and the First Amendment)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson