To: NathanR
voting for him would be more likely to actually advance their agenda than voting for Tom.Provide evidence for your claim.
Would bills forbidding partial birth abortions and allowing for parental notification of abortions by minors advance your adgenda or not?
Such bills would save some babies. Is McClintock opposed to such bills?
325 posted on
09/15/2003 1:06:27 PM PDT by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: MrLeRoy
VOTE TO SAVE THE CHILDREN - VOTE FOR SCHWARZENEGGER
340 posted on
09/15/2003 1:23:06 PM PDT by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: MrLeRoy
Such bills would save some babies. Is McClintock opposed to such bills?But that was not your question. The question is whether he will advance those items, and the answer to that is no. Both he and Arnold are both interested in getting the state back on her feet fiscally first.
341 posted on
09/15/2003 1:23:31 PM PDT by
NathanR
(California Si! Aztlan NO!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson