[ohioWfan]

This is the only one of your 3 posts to me I will respond to (your accusation that I have no principles is too stupid to try to refute).

We can argue until the cows come home, but the FACT is that in 1992, conservatives who were mad at GHW Bush for not being conservative enough, voted for a NON conservative, Ross Perot, and fed this country to the wolves by helping elect a debauched and dangerous man.

You can spin it any way you want, but you can't change the facts, sir.

[ohioWfan]

btw, in case you didn't notice, I'm from Ohio........I'm not voting for anyone in this election........

[MrLeRoy]

the FACT is that in 1992, conservatives who were mad at GHW Bush for not being conservative enough, voted for a NON conservative, Ross Perot

Can you provide evidence for this "fact"? I saw Perot as less conservative than Poppy, so I held my nose and voted for the latter.

[Maelstrom]

That was Bush's decision along with his RINOs.

Conservatives will vote conservative.

Perot at least *pretended* to be more conservative than Bush actually proved himself to be. Thus, Bush didn't get a lot of conservative votes.

Nonetheless, this simple lesson is one you're now ignoring in your race for yet another Republican Liberal. You want conservative votes, you need a conservative candidate. Otherwise...RINOs can go pound salt as they continue to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

[Artist]

"We can argue until the cows come home, but the FACT is that in 1992, conservatives who were mad at GHW Bush for not being conservative enough, voted for a NON conservative, Ross Perot, and fed this country to the wolves by helping elect a debauched and dangerous man."

Please explain to me how Arnold is not "debauched." If you haven't read the Oui article where he describes, in his own words, the gang-bang he participated in....and implies that the guys present who didn't participate weren't man enough....please do so before you reply.