[MrLeRoy]

McClintock is on Dennis Prager right now.

He just said that he will NOT ban abortion.

That's a damned shame.

Will he protect more or fewer babies than Arnold?

[68 grunt]

He will protect exactly the same amount.

[LisaAnne]

Arnold says that he will actively work for a ban on partial birth abortions.

Tom says that if a bill happens to make it to his desk that bans partial birth abortions, he will sign it.

So I guess the answer to your questions is, Tom will protect fewer babies than Arnold.

[BearArms]

Will he protect more or fewer babies than Arnold?

The irony here may be that Arnold would do more for pro-life than McClintock, by advancing the abortion restrictions he's in favor of, because it would behoove him to please the social conservative base that is suspicious of him. While McClintock doesn't have that problem and would likely fear the reaction of the liberal California press if he, the avowed pro-life champion, were to move to restrict abortion.

The fact that McClintock, like Simon before him, is now openly admitting that he would do nothing about abortion does not surprize me. He is now, in essence, operationally pro-choice. Purists please take note.