[exmarine]

We are no strangers to the ridicule that Medved endured are we? Neither was William Jennings Bryan - who more than held his own during the questioning in the Scopes trial. In fact, no evolutionist would dare take the stand in that trial. Cowards that they were. Since then, the story of that trial has been twisted to portray Bryan (a principled and intelligent Statesman) as a BUFFOON (read any evolutionists revisionist veersion of that trial for more info). The actual transcript is available for anyone to read and it is in stark contrast to the evolutionist myths. A stereotype has been created (based on pure mean-spirited bigotry) that creationists are buffoons and unscientific (as if evolutionists have a corner on science). I simply don't see that in modern debates between the two sides. Phil Johnson has done a great job of exposing materialists for the the self-refuting philosophers that they are, and people like Lee Spetner have exposed the flaws in the darwinian model.

[whattajoke]

ex,

I have respect for you and all that you've done in your life, despite our differences. I implore you to read up on the medved you defend. Please explain to me how you can agree with an obviously deranged person such as Ted.

http://www.bearfabrique.org/overview.html

[Lurking Libertarian]

Neither was William Jennings Bryan - who more than held his own during the questioning in the Scopes trial. In fact, no evolutionist would dare take the stand in that trial. Cowards that they were.

The defense called numerous scientific witnesses. The prosecution objected. The judge didn't let them testify. Who would you say was cowardly?