[VadeRetro]

If this context is correct, then there was no intent to misrepresent or to lie.

You're out of your mind, Hon! RWP's CV was right there for all to see the entire time. The page was linked directly for ALS many times. He was told to read it. He continued to lie. I don't have to tell you what I'm wearing if you're not blind and you're looking at me while we're talking.

I'm not interested in lawyerly outs. I'm not interested in how there's no making a creo see, except to see how far you're willing to keep the blinders on. But that will be for tomorrow.

[conservababeJen]

He was asked very clearly (repeatedly) and refused to answer (repeatedly). MOF...he still hasn't.

[ALS]

What CV page? What link?

I remember you yahoos saying it's "right there", but when I asked where is where, that's all I got.
The amazingly curious thing is that I asked each one of you is he a professor or not, and none of you said YES or NO.

Regardless, I don't see what you are trying to prove except the deviousness of your desperate attempt to win something.

Did I call the "prof" on the carpet? You bet I did. Did I do it again later when he started back with his tactics?
You bet I did. Each time he ran. Instead of defending himself, he ran.

The facts as laid on the this link:
http://www.conservababes.com/whine.html

Are exceedingly accurate. There is no stretch. That would be utterly pointless as that link was made available to all.
Anyone could have refuted it at any time. NO ONE did.

[Alamo-Girl]

You're out of your mind, Hon!

Surely you don't really mean that, Vade.

The page was linked directly for ALS many times. He was told to read it.

The link you provided doesn't support these assertions. If you have those pages, please link them as well.

I'm not interested in lawyerly outs.

My use of the jury example was to show that contrary presumptions for refusal to answer a direct question are not only understandable, but legal as well.