To: VadeRetro; PatrickHenry; gore3000; All
The Freep mail excerpt is very troubling to me, VadeRetro, because of the following accusation:
The answer lies in who it was that changed the agreement into two... one that passed and one that didn't.
Essentially, the assertion is that I conspired to trick the evolutionist side of the negotiation into signing on. That is utterly false. What actually happened is fully documented between posts 800-999 on the drafting thread.
However, if any of the parties who signed on to this agreement believes this assertion to be true - then I strongly suggest we nullify the agreement, y'all appoint a new mediator and re-vote the agreement.
No willing party should ever doubt the integrity of what they signed nor shall I tolerate having my character besmirched.
To: Alamo-Girl
Absolutely NOT, the agreement was gone over in good faith by you, and was voted on in good faith by us, KNOWING EXACTLY what ALS was doing.
We went into this with our eyes wide open, we saw exactly what was occurring, but it was NOT you that created the problem.
That assertion will get NO traction, And your character is not at ALL besmirched.
The agreement stands and will remain standing.
Megahugs!!
2,300 posted on
08/10/2003 9:26:29 AM PDT by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: Alamo-Girl; VadeRetro; PatrickHenry; All
However, if any of the parties who signed on to this agreement believes this assertion to be true - then I strongly suggest we nullify the agreement, y'all appoint a new mediator and re-vote the agreement.
No willing party should ever doubt the integrity of what they signed nor shall I tolerate having my character besmirched. Please calm down. The agreement seems to be working somewhat. Such things are liable to occur especially at the beginning. Hopefully it will pass. I for one have praised your actions on this agreement and continue to do so under difficult circumstances. I know that I have disagreed with some actions and some decisions since but as I said in my previous post what's done is done and what we need to do is make it work properly in the future.
2,305 posted on
08/10/2003 9:52:25 AM PDT by
gore3000
(Intelligent people do not believe in evolution.)
To: Alamo-Girl
However, if any of the parties who signed on to this agreement believes this assertion to be true - then I strongly suggest we nullify the agreement, y'all appoint a new mediator and re-vote the agreement. I have total confidence in your integrity, A-Girl. If I've misjudged you, then it means I have no powers of judgment at all, and I should drop out of all human activities. I didn't, and I won't. The agreement stands, as far as I'm concerned.
2,308 posted on
08/10/2003 10:15:14 AM PDT by
PatrickHenry
("Virtual Ignore" is now on!)
To: Alamo-Girl
Essentially, the assertion is that I conspired to trick the evolutionist side of the negotiation into signing on. That is utterly false.Pure, unadulterated BS (am I allowed to write this?). I read the drafting thread, and nowhere is the faintest suggestion that you tricked the evos or anyone else. Sour grapes, if you ask me...I'm sticking with the agreement.
To: Alamo-Girl
No willing party should ever doubt the integrity of what they signed nor shall I tolerate having my character besmirched. YOUR CHARACTER has never been in question! Another poster's certainly is.
I signed on knowing full well what was going to happen. Not to worry, I knew you were completely aboveboard! :-))
To: Alamo-Girl
Your character is fine. While we may have disagreements (and agreements) on various matters, I have found no problems with your behavior either on the Agreement or any other topic on FR.
2,344 posted on
08/10/2003 2:36:54 PM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson