[ALS]

That link is about as lame as it gets.

There's a far more definitive source than a few evo soundbites frought with an evo agenda.

The entire collection of Marx's letters and works are at:
http://marxists.org

whoda thunkit!

Here's more to refute your lame defense of marxism.
http://www.designeduniverse.com/als/notconservatism.html

[Virginia-American]

So, let's make like a lawyer and stipulate (or make like a mathematician and 'assume, as though it were possible') : "Marxism and Darwinsim are closely related" or "Darwin and Marx were soulmates/lovers" or something like that.

What possible bearing does this have on the truth of the standard biological ToE?

[Stultis]

Here's more to refute your lame defense of marxism.

LOL! I'm not defending Marxism. I understand, of course, that you aren't defending Marxism in general either. BUT YOU ARE defending A PARTICULAR CLAIM of Marx's, namely that Darwin's evolutionary theory -- in some way that you refuse to state -- supports his (Marx's) theory of history, economics and "class struggle".

IOW, even though you don't agree with Marx in general you DO agree with him on this point.

So, the ONLY person defending Marx in this thread is YOU!

The only person filling this thread with links to communist propaganda is YOU!

Instead, why don't you just state WHY you think Marx was correct about the relationship between communism and evolution. You know no freeper is going to read all the commmunist pap you keep linking. Just summarize the argument (making the large assumption that there actually is one).