You are way out of line. The agreement was made to enhance discussion and to make it a more pleasant environment for all concerned - not just those who agreed to it. In addition, ALS did agree to the agreement with the exception of going around calling people trolls due to his belief that it was uncivil to do so. Thirdly, this agreement is about civility and a call for not talking to someone because in the future they may be disruptive is uncivil and wrong according to the agreement. Any charges made by those who signed up have to be supported. Since you are calling for his being silenced ahead of his doing anything chargeable, it is you who is breaking the agreement, not ALS.
Lastly, the purpose of this agreement was to stop this constant bickering and letting people discuss the subject at hand. Discuss the subject, if the agrieved do not complain, it is not your business to do so in their behalf.
His behavior not only violates the agreement, but violates any contention that his objection to the agreement involved any supposed horror on his part of name-calling or other uncivil behaviors. In his freepmails he chortles over the agreement as a sprung trap.
whutta complete maroon!These are the arguments by which the Hand of God in creation is revealed. Argumentum ad Stoogeam.I bet yer scratching your fleas wondering how the heck did things end up so I got YOU to sign an agreement to behave and I didn't!
The answer lies in who it was that changed the agreement into two... one that passed and one that didn't.nyuck yuck!
evos is dumb!
And there you have it, just as we suspected and have been saying for the last week or so.
Our suspicions are born out, and he admitted it in a freepmail.
How dumb can you get?
NYUCK, NYUCK!!