To: gore3000
I engaged when I had sure footing and advice from others, I engaged when it was appropriate.
He is NOT a signatory to the agreement, he backed out of it.
Therefore, anything he has to say or critique is not worth the keyboard it's typed on.
He is NOT complying with said agreement and has stated that he won't, and seeing his behavior on this thread, it is obvious that he will not.
Therefore, EVERYTHING that I have stated is true, I have complied with said agreement, as witnessed to by everyone here.
THe moderator of the agreement even stated that I was in compliance.
It is time for me to go to bed, have a wonderful evening.
2,227 posted on
08/09/2003 11:54:30 PM PDT by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: Aric2000
I didn't back out of anything sparky. I agreed to a no name calling agreement which did not pass.
2,231 posted on
08/09/2003 11:57:41 PM PDT by
ALS
(http://designeduniverse.com Featuring original works by FR's finest . contact me to add yours!)
To: Aric2000
He is NOT a signatory to the agreement, he backed out of it. Where did he back out from it? He is there as agreeing to it except for the troll provision which is not the subject of the matter. Secondly civility is to be used towards all posters not just against those who sign it. It was uncivil of you to treat him uncivilly according to the rules of the agreement whether he is a signer or not. There was a long discussion on that because obviously newbies would not be signers of it since they did not know about it. Thirdly - anyone is able to complain about incivility. As far as I know there are no second class citizens on FR. In fact, the agreement was to make those signing on to it the ones with the fewer rights. The agreement was to restrain ourselves.
2,273 posted on
08/10/2003 1:43:38 AM PDT by
gore3000
(Intelligent people do not believe in evolution.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson