No, I referred to them right in the middle of post 2151:
Anyway, then I proceeded to analyze Pannehoek's full argument here and here, and found it a hopelessly muddled collection of plausible speculation and ad-hoc leaps joined by logical fallacies. In fact I concluded that his comparison of Darwinism and Marxism was "a cargo-cult justification for Marxism".
Your reaction was to characterize my contextual analysis of the quote you relied on as: ...
It's up to you to analyze my analysis of Pannehoek, and to show us all how my analysis is "blaming capitalism and God for Marxism", "defending Marxism", "putting all [my] faith in a Marxist", "tak[ing] to heart" the rest of his article, and "drool[ing] over their dogma, seeking to find something anti-conservative".
Put up or shut up.