To: RightWingNilla
Well thats fine for the technician. Some folks try to grasp the big picture and understand the science behind things. It doesn't make it any less valid. NASA engineers used classical newtonian mechanics to send Apollo to the moon. I suppose you are not a fan of Relativity either?Not just the technician. Electrical theory, as science, has not been particularly advanced by the QED. After all, it is concerned with electrons, not the quantum stuff.
I have no problem with relativity theory, actually I think that that theory meets Popper's criteria for a well stated theory quite well.
2,137 posted on
08/09/2003 10:00:35 PM PDT by
dark_lord
(The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
To: dark_lord
After all, it is concerned with electrons, not the quantum stuff. Replace QED, with elecromagnetic wave theory.
I have no problem with relativity theory, actually I think that that theory meets Popper's criteria for a well stated theory quite well.
Explain why it does better than TOE.
To: dark_lord
Electrical theory, as science, has not been particularly advanced by the QEDElectronics, as technology, sure has. Transistors rely on tunneling, 'holes', and other non-classical phenomena.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson