TOE says random mutations are the cause of diversity - and guess what you see when you look closely at the genomic structure of organisms? A jumbled, jury rigged mess that seems to work despite its woefully inefficient "design". IOW it looks like the culmination of a whole bunch of random events at the DNA level- unequal crossovers, duplications, substitutions, retrotranspositions, pseudogenes etc.
Now thats good enough for TOE. The observations fit the theory perfectly here. Can I completely rule out the possibility of an incompetent designer? I guess not. I would just rather not believe in such a thing.
Heh. Have you ever seen a software system that has been fixed, patched, enhanced, updated, upgraded, and modified over a period of thirty years? It has a name in the industry. Its called "spaghetti code". Hmmm. Sounds exactly like what you just described.
Can I completely rule out the possibility of an incompetent designer? I guess not. I would just rather not believe in such a thing.
But of course the system after 30 years hasn't really been "designed", now has it? It has instead been hacked, kludged, and munged. (Nicely descriptive words, aren't they?) Its amazing how much old software systems resemble nature.