Well, gee, how many chances do YOU give a rude, inconsiderate, ignorant, asinine, multiple-time banned disruptor?
Every chance in the world. Check it out if you doubt me. The evidence is there, if you want to go find it.
BTW balrog666; since we're speaking face to face here, I have a little unresolved "old business" that I wouldn't mind bringing up with you here. You claimed, not too long ago, something about "an idiot with several sycophants who also add nothing to the discussions except to get them pulled.... Until such time as these idiots wake up and behave politely, like the adults they claim to be, or are banned permanently as they should be, what's the point of participating?"
Let me just ask a humble question: This criterion that you cite, by means of which we might reliably know who is or who is not an "idiot" -- does this have any objective existence whatseover at what we might call the formative level, such that it is, in fact, a real principle?
We can all readily see easily enough that your assertion does have effect at the practical level, since you have clearly inserted your own private, "subjective" view into the mix here, and I, among others, have noticed this....
BUT -- on what does the "truth" of this insight depend? Regarding truth: Do the criteria of truth find a source outside of you, or do you get to run the whole show all by yourself, making up rules as needed, as you go along?
(In your dreams, dude....)