Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Aric2000
To: dely2

The "theory of Creationism"? I don't think I touched on that. The *theological* notion that the universe and humanity were "created" by an omnipotent God cannot be "disproven" by any form of empirical "science." That's ridiculous.The Christian "Creatio ex nihilo" by definition is, in real theology, beyond human cognition. It is a revealed "mystery" if you want to get theologically technical about it.There is no form of empirical or laboratory science which can "prove" that the universe was *not* created by a loving God. That's absurd in the extreme. That's why ... atheistic scientism --- is epistemologically dubious. There are no "scientific" data which in any way "prove" Christian theology to be "wrong" about anything. The existence of God, the immortality of the soul, the drama of redemption, and the divinity of Christ, for instance, are not within the realm of the physical sciences. It's fine to adhere to the various "theories" of evolution if that proves entertaining. "Evolution" does not present propositions or evidence which alter Christianity. That's expecting science to provide a metaphysics, a total view of reality.

78 Posted on 08/08/2001 17:39:24 PDT by veritas_in_enigma

That's expecting science to provide a metaphysics, a total view of reality.

1,334 posted on 07/30/2003 11:24:11 AM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1332 | View Replies ]


To: balrog666
Placemarker!
1,335 posted on 07/30/2003 11:28:38 AM PDT by balrog666 (Religions change; beer and wine remain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1334 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson