To: Aric2000
the agreement is not in effect son, and when it is, your definition of it will be meaningless, especially since you opted to continue to not behave.
1,163 posted on
07/29/2003 11:21:36 PM PDT by
ALS
(http://designeduniverse.com Featuring original works by FR's finest . contact me to add yours!)
To: Alamo-Girl
Here's where we are going to have the problem AG.
Any time we ask a specific question about the veracity of a quote, the athenticity of a statement, it is going to be viewed as an attack.
A thorough discussion regarding the motivation of the posts will be considered "Not behaving".
Sorry, when the other side gets to make the rules as we go along, as to what is and what is NOT proper behavior, this little agreement is NOT going to work at all.
I was very polite, I did NOT attack, I stated the facts as I saw them, yet I am being classified as misbehaving?
I am the one being attacked now, ALS is doing his incessant attack and whine bit, Newland is bitching about the fact that I am actually responding to his silly charges about Dimensio, and yet I am the one that is "misbehaving".
This ain't gonna work out too well at the rate your side is going.
So either figure out what it is you actually want to accomplish, and try to enforce it, or just forget the whole thing.
Have a great evening AG.
Good night.
1,168 posted on
07/29/2003 11:31:09 PM PDT by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson