Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
Not necessarily. For instance, if you have a population covering a large area, say a super continent, and then the area is split into one or more smaller areas, each of those populations becomes isolated. If the environment changes in any of those new areas, the population will change to adapt to that change. And, if any of the new environments remains stable with regard to the previous environment, the populations therein will remain stable. This ain't rocket science.
1,068 posted on 07/29/2003 5:39:30 PM PDT by Junior (Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1049 | View Replies ]


To: Junior
If the environment changes in any of those new areas, the population will change to adapt to that change.

Of course, it ain't rocket science. That is its problem. Why go to all of the problem of restating what I stated. A stable population remains stable unless a change occurs. The more stable the population, the bigger the change required to make it something else.

1,071 posted on 07/29/2003 6:14:03 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1068 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson