Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pheobe Debates The Theory of Evolution
Original scene from the show... Friends. ^ | NA | NA

Posted on 07/24/2003 1:55:39 PM PDT by Mr.Atos

I was just lisening to Medved debating Creationism with Athiests on the air. I found it interesting that while Medved argued his side quite effectively from the standpoint of faith, his opponents resorted to condescension and beliitled him with statements like, "when it rains, is that God crying?" I was reminded of the best (at least most amusing)debate that I have ever heard on the subject of Creationism vs Evolution, albeit a fictional setting. It occurred on the show, Friends of all places between the characters Pheobe (The Hippy) and Ross (The Paleontologist). It went like this...

Pheebs: Okay...it's very faint, but I can still sense him in the building...GO INTO THE LIGHT MR. HECKLES!!

Ross: Whoa, whoa, whoa. What, uh, you don't believe in evolution? Pheebs: Nah. Not really. Ross: You don't believe in evolution? Pheebs: I don't know. It's just, ya know, monkeys, Darwin, ya know, it's a, it's a nice story. I just think it's a little too easy.

Ross: Uh, excuse me. Evolution is not for you to buy, Phoebe. Evolution is scientific fact. Like, like, the air we breathe, like gravity... Pheebs: Uh, okay, don't get me started on gravity.

Ross: You uh, you don't believe in gravity? Pheebs: Well, it's not so much that ya know, like I don't *believe* in it, ya know. It's just...I don't know. Lately I get the feeling that I'm not so much being pulled down, as I am being pushed.

Ross: How can you NOT BELIEVE in evolution? Pheebs: [shrugs] I unh-huh...Look at this funky shirt!!

Ross: Well, there ya go. Pheebs: Huh. So now, the REAL question is: who put those fossils there, and why...?

Ross: OPPOSABLE THUMBS!! Without evolution, how do YOU explain OPPOSABLE THUMBS?!? Pheebs: Maybe the overlords needed them to steer their spacecrafts!

Pheebs: Uh-oh! Scary Scientist Man!

Pheebs: Okay, Ross? Could you just open your mind like, *this* much?? Okay? Now wasn't there a time when the brightest minds in the world believed that the Earth was flat? And up until what, like, fifty years ago, you all thought the atom was the smallest thing, until you split it open, and this like, whole mess o' crap came out! Now, are you telling me that you are so unbelievably arrogant that you can't admit that there's a teeny, tiny possibility that you could be wrong about this?!?

Pheebs: I can't believe you caved. Ross: What? Pheebs: You just ABANDONED your whole belief system! I mean, before, I didn't agree with you, but at least I respected you. Ross: But uh.. Pheebs: Yeah...how...how are you gonna go in to work tomorrow? How...how are you gonna face the other science guys? How...how are you gonna face yourself? Oh! [Ross runs away dejected] Pheebs: That was fun. So who's hungry?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,501-1,5201,521-1,5401,541-1,560 ... 2,721-2,723 next last
To: CobaltBlue
Yeah. But why spoil the fun?
1,521 posted on 07/30/2003 8:03:24 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1495 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Look, we've disagreed in the past, but before you get banned again, welcome back! You may have been horribly wrong, often, but you were never uninteresting.
1,522 posted on 07/30/2003 8:16:29 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1510 | View Replies]

To: js1138
I have an analogy for you.

Do you need to make this analogy before you can answer my question? Or did you just mean not to answer my question at all?

1,523 posted on 07/30/2003 8:20:11 PM PDT by betty boop (We can have either human dignity or unfettered liberty, but not both. -- Dean Clancy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1498 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
But you don't accept a standard definition of species.

Totally false. I have strongly stated many times that the only legitimate definition of species is the biological definition - a species is a group of organisms which can reproduce with each other and produce viable, reproducing progeny. I have strongly argued against the subjective definitions of the evolutionists.

First of all creation and destruction are opposites. You do not create anything by destroying-me-

Even that is false.

No, biologically it is true. While your statements may all be correct, they are irrelevant to the discussion which is that the genetic basis of a species is reduced, not increased by natural selection. It also does not deal with the scientific facts that show that breeds which are 'mongrelized' are hardier, live longer and have more defenses against sickness, etc. than the pure breeds. The evidence that selection does not make for an improvement in a species is overwhelming. Here's the reason. Let's say that half of a species got destroyed because it could not genetically deal with cold weather. What would happen next time the environmental conditions turn around? The species would not be able to deal with the warm weather and the 'survivors' would die and with it the species. That is why the greater the genetic pool of a species, the hardier it is. Further, let's remember that all individuals carry two copies of a gene and can, in one and the same individual pass on genes for opposite situations. This makes the species very hardy indeed and is why selection is bad for a species.

1,524 posted on 07/30/2003 8:20:18 PM PDT by gore3000 (Intelligent people do not believe in evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1520 | View Replies]

To: inquest
On the other hand, his theory might help to explain why major chords produce one emotional response in every culture, whereas minor chords produce a very different response.

Are you referring the fact that in Jewish music, Major is used for atonement and minor for happy? That would seem to be the norm. "Hava Nagila" is very happy.

Most of this is learned responses, but having minor=happy and major=atonement is common.

1,525 posted on 07/30/2003 8:28:14 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1262 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
My hands were off the keyboard the whole time.

Psychic? Things have changed.



1,526 posted on 07/30/2003 8:28:20 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1515 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
It also does not deal with the scientific facts that show that breeds which are 'mongrelized' are hardier, live longer and have more defenses against sickness, etc. than the pure breeds.

Hybrid crossbills are less able to survive than either parent species. I posted a link earlier in the thread. The same is true of most wild hybrids. Hybrid vigor is largely a result of human-produced inbreeding. Making inferences from mongrel dogs, where the parent breeds were selected according to the bizarre preferences of human breeders rather than survival in the wild, is fallacious.

The point that selection is bad for a species would work if we selected for species, rather than individuals or genes; and if mutations were not continually occuring. While selection removes variation, mutations create more.

1,527 posted on 07/30/2003 8:28:22 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1524 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Welcome back, you son of a bitch!

Thanks. It's my Mom's birthday today, actually.



1,528 posted on 07/30/2003 8:33:39 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1514 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
"Festival of placemarkers" placemarker
1,529 posted on 07/30/2003 8:37:55 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1511 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Thank very much. If you can't be horribly wrong, you aren't trying.



1,530 posted on 07/30/2003 8:40:40 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1522 | View Replies]

To: Nebullis
The Nazi's actually preferred Johann Strauss to Wagner. Supposedly Strauss had a distant (I forgot how far) Jewish ancestor and that was hushed up.

Music was the only art that really flourished under the Nazi's. As Beethoven's fifth sympnony was used in SS initiation cecemonies (the transition from the third to the fourth movement accompanied with the opening of a curtain to cast light on the new initiates), could Beethoven be blamed for Nazism?

The plastic arts (painting, scuplture) were really in bad shape as Hitler had his own aesthetic on these matters (and IMHO he couldn't tell a hawk from a handsaw.)
1,531 posted on 07/30/2003 8:46:28 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1325 | View Replies]

To: Junior
I hit abuse. I'd apologize if I cared. I wanted to see if there was any level of personal abuse that would get the mods to take a specific action against a specific individual. 'Shut your whiney piehole' evidently ain't it.
1,532 posted on 07/30/2003 8:47:05 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1494 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Fer shure.
1,533 posted on 07/30/2003 8:48:18 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1530 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
By their silence when asked, they give their assent.
1,534 posted on 07/30/2003 9:16:08 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1424 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
I hope this comment stays. Especially as (I predict) that none of his co-web-authors will criticize this behavior. It's sort of the echt-Creationist method of argumentation the I've observed over the past few decades.
1,535 posted on 07/30/2003 9:25:14 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1462 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
To: f.Christian

Yup, it comes under:

If the facts don't support the theory, change the facts.

In this case, the theory is that there is no God, that man is just another animal and animals are as good or no better or the same as we are, i.e., man is NOT endowed by his Creator with unalienable rights. IOW, the STATE can be first and foremost in the lives of all people since there IS no God, no higher power than the State.

The FACTS don't support this theory that there is no God.

What to do, what to do....CHANGE THE FACTS!

We know so-called educators and the class of EDUCRATS cook the books to support diversity, collectivism, enviro-Nazism, "limits of growth," and on and on. And yet we are supposed to believe them when they dream up their theories of "evolution" ALSO cooked up to support their leftist theories of man?

In a nutshell, here's the deal: the theory of EVOLUTION is cut from the same whole cloth as Marxism. The movement of communism required "scientific" support, and, viola! The educlass embraced "evoultion" simultaneously to embracing the totalitarian collectivist "total state."

Why Freepers would believe these wacky leftists who have PROVEN that they cook the FACTS to support their liberal intentions is beyond me.

To establish the TOTAL STATE, and to ... destroy Western Civilization and the Judeo-Christian ethic --- which made it possible, the inteligensia MUST establish that there is no God, that man has no inherent rights, and that the STATE is the highest entity. And that it is the STATE to which we owe our allegiance.

161 Posted on 08/26/2001 14:21:21 PDT by gg188

1,536 posted on 07/30/2003 9:26:12 PM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1534 | View Replies]

To: Virginia-American
Most of Kolmogorov's work. Much of Prokofiev (even though I don't like it very much.)
1,537 posted on 07/30/2003 9:36:23 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1516 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
Thank you so much for your agreement!

For other Freepers and Lurkers, the latest draft is here.

With regard to endeavoring to cause corrections, the intended targets are "urban legends" - of the type we see now and again on Free Republic.

For instance, there was once a very official looking quote attributed to Janet Reno in a 60 Minutes interview on a particular date which was bogus. The essence of the quote was that the DoJ was intentionally targeting fundamentalist Christians. One of the Freepers here - I believe it might have been Brian Moseley - had the actual 60 minutes tape for that date, watched it thoroughly and came back with the verdict that it never happened. Later, it showed up on various "urban legend" websites as bogus.

IOW, if we research something and find it is false we ought to try to get the website which originally had the bogus information to make the correction.

1,538 posted on 07/30/2003 9:47:48 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1513 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
It also does not deal with the scientific facts that show that breeds which are 'mongrelized' are hardier, live longer and have more defenses against sickness, etc. than the pure breeds.-me-

Hybrid crossbills are less able to survive than either parent species.

You keep going off subject. We are not talking hybrids, we are talking organisms of the same species. Everywhere you look from humans to dogs, to horses, to whatever, the cross-breeds are hardier than the thorough breeds - and so are the Darwin finches cross breeds.

The point that selection is bad for a species would work if we selected for species,

In case you forgot, evolution is about species, not individuals. We have been speaking about evolution and therefore about species. If the species does not survive, the individuals will not survive either. The smaller the genetics basis of the species the more apt it is to be destroyed by new environmental changes. As to mutations, no one has shown a mutation which gave a species a new function, so that is wishful thinking by evolutionists and not scientific fact. Science is about 'is' not 'may be'.

1,539 posted on 07/30/2003 9:52:28 PM PDT by gore3000 (Intelligent people do not believe in evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1527 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Thank you for the heads up to your post! You said:

Is it really fair to demand that someone answer a potentially private question?

IMHO, there is nothing wrong with asking, but it would be troubling to continue asking if the person did not wish to answer. For instance, if someone asked me my real name and I answered "I don't wish to post my real name on this forum" they shouldn't keep asking me.

1,540 posted on 07/30/2003 9:53:11 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1503 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,501-1,5201,521-1,5401,541-1,560 ... 2,721-2,723 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson