If you think you can prove anything I posted is dishonest then give it your best shot. I bet you can't.
But don't hand out reading assignments and expect me to do your homework for you in order prove your point.
You posted exactly the Simpson quote dissected here and you're too dumb/dyslexic to understand the dishonesty?
Untangle this one for me, Sherlock! Aric chided you for citing George Gaylord Simpson in 1953 when so many important transitionals have been found post-1953. You waved this objection away by citing Nebraska Man, 1922. How honest was that?
Is this still over your head?